IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v25y2016i4p437-448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Histogram ranking with generalised similarity-based TOPSIS applied to patent ranking

Author

Listed:
  • Pasi Luukka
  • Mikael Collan

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a new version of the well-known TOPSIS method: similarity-based TOPSIS. The new method uses a similarity measure to replace the commonly used distance measure. Similarity measure is formed under generalised Łukasiewicz structure that allows us to form the measure in a more general structure and this way enhances (patent) ranking results. At the same time, however, the selection of a similarity parameter becomes a problem. To fix this new problem, a new method that we call histogram ranking is introduced. Histogram ranking is usable for relaxing the dependence of ranking on parameter value; it is designed to be a complement to parameter dependent ranking methods and is usable, when it is difficult to select precise parameter values. Histogram ranking is based on calculating the centre of gravity points from the histograms and this information is then used to form parameter value independent ranking of the object.

Suggested Citation

  • Pasi Luukka & Mikael Collan, 2016. "Histogram ranking with generalised similarity-based TOPSIS applied to patent ranking," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 25(4), pages 437-448.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:25:y:2016:i:4:p:437-448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=75290
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:25:y:2016:i:4:p:437-448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Carmel O'Grady) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Carmel O'Grady to update the entry or send us the correct email address. General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.