IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v18y2013i3p239-254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Replenishment decisions under two-level credit policy for flexible credit linked demand

Author

Listed:
  • Chandra K. Jaggi
  • Suresh Kumar Goyal
  • P.K. Kapur
  • Satish K. Goel

Abstract

Trade credit affects the conduct of business significantly for many reasons. For the supplier who offers trade credit, it is an effective means of price discrimination as well as efficient method to stimulate the demand of his products. Trade credit in the form of permissible delay in payments has direct influence on inventory as well as on the demand of an item. Unfortunately, the influence of credit period on demand has received very little attention in the literature, whereas in reality, length of the offered credit period has positive influence on the demand rate which may be instant or delayed. Hence, to consider the flexible influence of trade credit on the demand of an item, a discrete logistic credit linked demand function has been developed which takes care of both the instant as well as delayed impact of the credit period on the demand rate. Based on the EOQ model, this paper analyses the problem of the retailer who has to decide his trade credit period and cycle length simultaneously under the two levels of trade credit policy. An example is given to illustrate the theoretical results. Computational results provide some interesting policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Chandra K. Jaggi & Suresh Kumar Goyal & P.K. Kapur & Satish K. Goel, 2013. "Replenishment decisions under two-level credit policy for flexible credit linked demand," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(3), pages 239-254.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:18:y:2013:i:3:p:239-254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=56684
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:18:y:2013:i:3:p:239-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.