IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v17y2013i4p449-482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling and analysis of a multi-stage system involving batch processors with incompatible job families

Author

Listed:
  • John Benedict C. Tajan
  • Appa Iyer Sivakumar
  • Stanley B. Gershwin

Abstract

Batch processors can concurrently process more than one job, and are commonly used in complex manufacturing systems such as wafer fabrication facilities (wafer fabs). Previous work has shown that there can be a significant reduction in cycle time when the control of the upstream serial processor is dependent on the batch processor. We wish to determine whether this is also true when the upstream processor is also a batch processor, with smaller capacity. We model a two-stage system with an upstream batch processor and a downstream batch processor under differing simple control policies as a continuous time-discrete state Markov chain. In doing so, we show that the concept of constraining the production of the upstream processor in accordance to the anticipated needs of the downstream batch processor can similarly reduce mean system cycle time when the upstream processor is a smaller batch processor. We also perform simulation experiments, using parameters close to those found in wafer fabs, and confirm that the strategy of prioritising the formation of larger batches for the downstream batch processor typically results in substantial cycle time reductions for the two-stage system.

Suggested Citation

  • John Benedict C. Tajan & Appa Iyer Sivakumar & Stanley B. Gershwin, 2013. "Modelling and analysis of a multi-stage system involving batch processors with incompatible job families," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(4), pages 449-482.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:17:y:2013:i:4:p:449-482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=54976
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:17:y:2013:i:4:p:449-482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.