IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v16y2013i3p349-374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

University website quality comparison by using non-parametric statistical test: a case study from Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • P.D.D. Dominic
  • Handaru Jati
  • Suhaiza Hanim

Abstract

This research conducts some tests to measure the quality of Malaysian University website via web diagnostic tools online. We propose a methodology for determining and evaluating the best university website based on many criteria of website quality, consist of linear weightage model (LWM), analytical hierarchy process, fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) and new hybrid model (NHM). This NHM has been implemented using combination of LWM and FAHP to generate the weights for the criteria which are better and more fairly preference. The result of this study confirmed that most of the Malaysian University websites are neglecting performance and quality criteria. By applying hybrid model between LWM and FAHP approach for website evaluation has resulted in significant acceleration of implementation, raised the overall effectiveness with respect to the underlying methodology and ultimately enabled more efficient and significantly equal or better procedure compared with other methods.

Suggested Citation

  • P.D.D. Dominic & Handaru Jati & Suhaiza Hanim, 2013. "University website quality comparison by using non-parametric statistical test: a case study from Malaysia," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(3), pages 349-374.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:16:y:2013:i:3:p:349-374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=52335
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:16:y:2013:i:3:p:349-374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.