IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v14y2012i1p94-119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost analysis of a bulk service retrial queue

Author

Listed:
  • M. Haridass
  • R. Arumuganathan
  • M. Senthilkumar

Abstract

This paper studies a batch arrival general bulk service retrial queueing model with constant retrial rate. The primary customers arrive in bulk according to Poisson process and they get service under general bulk service rule with minimum of one customer and maximum of 'b' customers. If the arriving batch of customers, of size 'ξ', 1 ≤ ξ ≤ b , finds the server free, then all of them get service immediately; while, if the size of the arriving batch is more than 'b', then, 'b' customers enter the service station and the remaining ξ − b customers join the orbit. However, if an arriving batch of customers finds the server busy, then the entire batch joins the orbit in order to seek service again. The customers in the orbit will try for service one by one with a constant retrial rate 'ν' when the server is idle. For the proposed model, the probability generating function of the steady-state queue size distribution at an arbitrary time, expected number of customers in the orbit, expected waiting time, expected length of busy period and expected length of busy cycle are obtained. The cost analysis of the queueing system is discussed. The effects of several parameters on the system are analysed numerically.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Haridass & R. Arumuganathan & M. Senthilkumar, 2012. "Cost analysis of a bulk service retrial queue," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(1), pages 94-119.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:14:y:2012:i:1:p:94-119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=46345
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:14:y:2012:i:1:p:94-119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.