IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v14y2012i1p50-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A PSO-based procedure for a bi-level multi-objective TOC-based job-shop scheduling problem

Author

Listed:
  • Chompoonoot Kasemset
  • Voratas Kachitvichyanukul

Abstract

This study presents an application of particle swarm optimisation (PSO) algorithm for a bi-level multi-objective job-shop scheduling problem. The bi-level decision-making requirement stems from the concept of theory of constraints. At the first level, the decision is made by concentrating on minimising idle time on the system bottleneck. The second-level decision is made to plan other machines while maintaining the maximum use of the bottleneck and gaining improvements in other performance measures. This paper proposed a PSO-based procedure for solving the bi-level programming problem. The proposed procedure simplifies the solution method by simultaneously providing solutions for the objective of both levels. In addition, during the schedule generation process, the job-shop case applied in this study also considers the machine set-up time, transfer lot size and product demands to make the model more realistic. The numerical examples are given to demonstrate how this approach works. The results from this procedure are compared with the solutions obtained by a commercial optimiser, the LINGO 10 software package. This proposed PSO is implemented in C# programming language in order to obtain the final solution within the short computational time.

Suggested Citation

  • Chompoonoot Kasemset & Voratas Kachitvichyanukul, 2012. "A PSO-based procedure for a bi-level multi-objective TOC-based job-shop scheduling problem," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(1), pages 50-69.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:14:y:2012:i:1:p:50-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=46343
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:14:y:2012:i:1:p:50-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.