IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijnvor/v3y2006i2p202-219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance evaluation of an auction-based job allocation model for small- and medium-sized enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Govind Bajaj
  • Can Saygin
  • Scott E. Grasman
  • Ming C. Leu

Abstract

This paper extends the application scope of a previously developed auction-based shop floor control model to the enterprise level and evaluates its performance for the coordination and collaboration of spatially distributed Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs). The model uses the contract net protocol to facilitate the negotiation process among SMEs and consists of two main components: task proposal formulation and bid formulation. An agent-based simulation environment is developed in ProModel to evaluate the impact of two negotiation factors and due date slack of tasks on tardiness, earliness and absolute due date deviation of tasks. A mixed-level factorial Design of Experiments (DOE) is carried out by considering different levels of α, β and K, and the results of the simulation study are analysed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) in Minitab. This study shows that the auction-based model is effective for the task allocation among SMEs, yet it is necessary to fine-tune the negotiation factors based on the due-date-related performance measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Govind Bajaj & Can Saygin & Scott E. Grasman & Ming C. Leu, 2006. "Performance evaluation of an auction-based job allocation model for small- and medium-sized enterprises," International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(2), pages 202-219.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijnvor:v:3:y:2006:i:2:p:202-219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=9535
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijnvor:v:3:y:2006:i:2:p:202-219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=22 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.