IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijnvor/v28y2023i2-3-4p106-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and analysis of classroom teaching quality of art design specialty based on DBT-SVM

Author

Listed:
  • Junmei Guo

Abstract

Evaluating the quality of classroom teaching in higher education can improve teachers' teaching, but the evaluating results are currently inaccurate. The study combines the binary tree support vector machine (BT-SVM) and the Euclidean distance method to obtain the distance binary tree support vector machine (DBT-SVM) algorithm. The performance of DBT-SVM algorithm is tested and compared with one versus one (OVO) algorithm and one versus rest (OVR) algorithm. The results show that the accuracy of the DBT-SVM is 92.2% and the test time is 0.02 s; it is superior to the traditional algorithms. In the empirical analysis of the evaluation model, the accuracy rate of the DBT-SVM algorithm model is 97.85%, which is superior to TW-SVM and traditional algorithm models. The results show that the performance of the optimised DBT-SVM algorithm has greatly improved the accuracy and test time of the traditional SVM algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Junmei Guo, 2023. "Evaluation and analysis of classroom teaching quality of art design specialty based on DBT-SVM," International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 28(2/3/4), pages 106-121.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijnvor:v:28:y:2023:i:2/3/4:p:106-121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=133833
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijnvor:v:28:y:2023:i:2/3/4:p:106-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=22 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.