IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijnvor/v24y2021i3p211-234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

eGovernment whole-of-government approach for good governance: the case of the system GID in Morocco

Author

Listed:
  • Said Azelmad

Abstract

Public administration reforms, in Morocco, called for the use of ICTs to connect administrations in a whole-of-government approach, building a culture of collaboration and good governance. Indeed, coordination theory supports the networked bureaucracy, as a catalyst for heterogeneous multi-stakeholder management, internal auditing and synergy. Institutional networked coordination is believed to increase interoperability and integration among offices for transparency and mutual accountability. A mutual collaboration (G2G) that is deemed to better governance, streamline workflows and reduce duplication of workflows and tasks. However, stove-piped management remains always a bad omen for networked governance for its single-purpose management. It is believed to separate offices in corrupted dispersed silos and bureaucracies, operating in ambiguity, red tape and bad governance. Results from an online survey of public agents, using the GID system in Morocco (n = 253) was used to empirically analyse the effect of eGovernment whole-of-government approach on good governance ethics in back offices, using PLS-SEM.

Suggested Citation

  • Said Azelmad, 2021. "eGovernment whole-of-government approach for good governance: the case of the system GID in Morocco," International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 24(3), pages 211-234.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijnvor:v:24:y:2021:i:3:p:211-234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=115813
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijnvor:v:24:y:2021:i:3:p:211-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=22 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.