IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijnvor/v15y2015i2-3p242-255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The trustworthiness of reference group and cooperative quality: implications for online crowdsourcing market

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoling Li
  • Qian Tian
  • Hui Yan
  • Xinjian Li

Abstract

Crowdsourcing is one emerging business model featured by value cooperation of focal agent and crowds. The trustworthiness of first movers, they act as reference groups, would provide referent information for crowds' decision. It is necessary to develop an understanding of the relationship of reference groups and the cooperative quality of crowd task. The authors argue that reference groups can obtain trustworthiness in the eyes of the crowd, such as integrity trustworthiness and ability trustworthiness. We examine the influence mechanism of trustworthiness of reference groups, and testify our arguments with secondary data from a typical crowdsourcing website. We found that, when the perceived risk of task is high, the effect of reference groups' integrity trustworthiness on crowds' participation is greater than ability trustworthiness. While the perceived risk is low, the effect of reference groups' ability trustworthiness on crowds' participation is greater than integrity trustworthiness. And the degree increase of the participation of crowd will improve cooperative quality between focal agent and qualified crowd. The paper supposes management policies based on the empirical research.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoling Li & Qian Tian & Hui Yan & Xinjian Li, 2015. "The trustworthiness of reference group and cooperative quality: implications for online crowdsourcing market," International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(2/3), pages 242-255.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijnvor:v:15:y:2015:i:2/3:p:242-255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=70434
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijnvor:v:15:y:2015:i:2/3:p:242-255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=22 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.