IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijnvor/v11y2012i1p30-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance analysis of modified secure link state routing protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Shaimaa A. El-said

Abstract

Secure link state protocol (SLIP) is the most effective scheme proposed so far to protect the internet infrastructure against routing table 'poisoning' attacks. The major disadvantage of the SLIP is its failure in protecting the network in the case of inactive routing table attacks and in some cases of proactive attacks. A successful attempt is carried out to improve the performance of secure link state protocol SLIP applied to protect internet infrastructure in a communication network. A modified secure link state protocol (MSLIP) is proposed to overcome the problems found in the SLIP, since it takes the advantages of SLIP and adds the necessary operations to protect the internet infrastructure in all the cases of inactive and proactive routing attacks. A complete comparison under different scenarios is performed between the performances of MSLIP, SLIP and traditional LS are presented in this work. A sensible results and valuable practical relation are obtained. The results show that the performance of the MSLIP is better than the existing SLIP as well as traditional link secure protocol LS.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaimaa A. El-said, 2012. "Performance analysis of modified secure link state routing protocol," International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 30-47.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijnvor:v:11:y:2012:i:1:p:30-47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=47879
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijnvor:v:11:y:2012:i:1:p:30-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=22 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.