IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmtma/v7y2005i1p41-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Product mix decisions and production lot sizes

Author

Listed:
  • Olli-Pekka Hilmola

Abstract

According to the earlier research related to the product mix decisions, the approach called throughput accounting seems to provide much better results than conventional management accounting. However, all the examples so far have assumed that cycle times in used resources are not dependent on any other variable. In practice, the situation is not so simplified; the decisions related to production lot sizes will affect the cycle time requirement of a product in a particular resource, and, in the case of capacity constraint, the product's and system's profitability. The main cause for this is the setup time in a particular resource. As can be concluded from the results of this paper, the appropriate lot sizing decisions will enable system to produce more with its existing resources and therefore increase its profits significantly. As the performed sensitivity analysis suggests, the differences between traditional management accounting and throughput accounting will become increasingly insignificant after lot sizes have been somewhat increased. According to shown results it is being suggested that lot sizing decisions are rather important for the profitability of manufacturing unit, and especially in capacity constraint resource(s) the use of smaller lot sizes should be avoided.

Suggested Citation

  • Olli-Pekka Hilmola, 2005. "Product mix decisions and production lot sizes," International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 41-51.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmtma:v:7:y:2005:i:1:p:41-51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=6501
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmtma:v:7:y:2005:i:1:p:41-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.