IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmtma/v6y2004i1-2p171-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Focus groups: impact of quality and process capability factors on the silicon wafer slicing process

Author

Listed:
  • Chin-Tsai Lin
  • Che-Wei Chang
  • Chie-Bein Chen

Abstract

Silicon wafer slicing is a highly complex manufacturing process, complicating efforts to monitor individual product type process stability and quality control effectively. Specifically, silicon wafer slicing involves multiple quality characteristics that occur synchronously. However, quantitative methods, such as process capability indices (PCIs) and statistical process control (SPC) charts, for monitoring slicing problems are limited. Therefore, this study presents a focus group procedure that explores engineering knowledge and expertise. Organisations can use focus groups to create knowledge of stable processes, optimal settings and quality control. Interactive discussions indicate that focus groups can improve productivity and decision making effectiveness either by accelerating the decision making or by increasing decision quality. Moreover, the proposed procedure enables an engineer to rapidly adjust a manufacturing system to eliminate problems related to slicing process instability phenomena and improve slicing quality and process capability. Finally, the SPC chart and the exponential weighted moving average (EWMA) control chart are presented to demonstrate and verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Chin-Tsai Lin & Che-Wei Chang & Chie-Bein Chen, 2004. "Focus groups: impact of quality and process capability factors on the silicon wafer slicing process," International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1/2), pages 171-184.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmtma:v:6:y:2004:i:1/2:p:171-184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=4513
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmtma:v:6:y:2004:i:1/2:p:171-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.