IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmtma/v39y2025i3-4-5p390-405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysing the process and quality evaluation of body-in-white part inspection methodology using augmented reality: an investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Dhiviandran Chadaran
  • Ainul Akmar Mokhtar
  • Hilmi Hussin

Abstract

Automotive body manufacturing runs based on processes and each process requires a cycle time. Producing good quality products within the stipulated cycle time is necessary. Measuring the quality of finished product is also part of the cycle and consumes time. Standard average time has been investigated and discussed for a case study of 30 samples from a similar product. Datum point inspection method using checking fixtures is discussed and measuring points of the product are determined. Finding inconsistencies of process time and rejected product are discussed. Measuring the quality of the finished product is also part of the process. An average of 71.6% of time was used for datum measurement. The advancement of augmented reality in measuring the quality of manufactured products has been investigated and discovered that there is a 20% in reduction of datum measurement process time compared to conventional method. This research ought to be an interactive approach in quality inspection, replacing the need for hardcopy instruction manuals as well as time saving process in contrast to conventional method.

Suggested Citation

  • Dhiviandran Chadaran & Ainul Akmar Mokhtar & Hilmi Hussin, 2025. "Analysing the process and quality evaluation of body-in-white part inspection methodology using augmented reality: an investigation," International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 39(3/4/5), pages 390-405.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmtma:v:39:y:2025:i:3/4/5:p:390-405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=145944
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmtma:v:39:y:2025:i:3/4/5:p:390-405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.