IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmtma/v23y2011i1-2p34-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of dynamic work sharing production methods to reduce the impact of labour turnover in serial assembly lines

Author

Listed:
  • J. Rene Villalobos
  • Marco A. Gutierrez
  • Luis R. Mar
  • Octavio Sanchez
  • Omar Ahumada

Abstract

Labour turnover is one of the major complications that industry faces on a daily basis. Turnover is particularly harmful to serial assembly lines. The learning process that a new operator must undergo when first introduced to an assembly line station generates blockage and starvation in the previous and successive stations, causing a reduction in the line's throughput. In this paper, we analyse different work allocation strategies for serial assembly line designs in order to determine which designs perform best under the presence of labour turnover and a task-learning process. In particular, we compare the traditional balanced line with two other assembly line designs, a variant of the bucket brigades (BB) and a hybrid method – the modified work sharing (MWS) method. By making a judicious use of control buffers, the MWS method seeks to combine the positive characteristics of both the BB and traditional balanced lines to naturally adapt to different levels of labour turnover. The results presented in this paper show that the MWS outperforms the BB and the balanced designs.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Rene Villalobos & Marco A. Gutierrez & Luis R. Mar & Octavio Sanchez & Omar Ahumada, 2011. "The use of dynamic work sharing production methods to reduce the impact of labour turnover in serial assembly lines," International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(1/2), pages 34-53.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmtma:v:23:y:2011:i:1/2:p:34-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=42107
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmtma:v:23:y:2011:i:1/2:p:34-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.