IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmpra/v9y2016i4p344-364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Succession, division, and the drive for self-employment: the case of the renowned Hong Kong restaurant 'Yung Kee'

Author

Listed:
  • Victor Zheng
  • Po-San Wan
  • Siu-Lun Wong

Abstract

Since the practice of equal division of assets among sons (the equal inheritance system) is the institutional and cultural context of Chinese family businesses, the capital that has accumulated in the family property is continually diluted in the process of family division. This can obviously lead to strife. Academics have explored in depth the obstacles that this custom poses to the continued development of a business. However, these discussions have very seldom touched upon the equally pervasive positive aspects of this custom, which are brought about by division and competition. This paper uses the case of Yung Kee, a renowned restaurant in Hong Kong, to illustrate this under-studied area. In describing the development of the business, and the division and contention over the family's assets, we analyse the situation wherein no distinction is made between older and younger sons in the system of an equal division of property among the sons, and how this practice encourages the members of the family to develop their potential and compete with each other. From this process, we locate the source of the dynamism in Chinese family businesses - entrepreneurship, i.e. the strong drive for self-employment.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor Zheng & Po-San Wan & Siu-Lun Wong, 2016. "Succession, division, and the drive for self-employment: the case of the renowned Hong Kong restaurant 'Yung Kee'," International Journal of Management Practice, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(4), pages 344-364.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:9:y:2016:i:4:p:344-364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=79614
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:9:y:2016:i:4:p:344-364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=91 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.