IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmpra/v7y2014i2p144-159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The perceived size of packages of complex vs. simple shape depends upon the number of packages presented

Author

Listed:
  • Lawrence L. Garber Jr.
  • Eva M. Hyatt
  • Ãœnal Ö. Boya

Abstract

A research gap exists regarding the respective effects of package shape and presentation context on size perception. Some prior research shows that complex packages appear larger than simple packages of equal volume. Other research shows the opposite. We resolve the dilemma by showing that shape and presentation context interact to create size impressions. Subjects estimated the relative volumes of sets of packages whose shapes are simple or complex, presented in package sets whose numbers range from two to 16. When packages are displayed in sets of nine or more, packages of simple shape appear larger than packages of complex shape. When packages are presented in sets of eight or less, complex packages appear larger than simple packages. This reversal suggests that the volume estimation strategies employed by consumers change when the complexity of the visual tableau before them leads to cognitive overload.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence L. Garber Jr. & Eva M. Hyatt & Ãœnal Ö. Boya, 2014. "The perceived size of packages of complex vs. simple shape depends upon the number of packages presented," International Journal of Management Practice, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 144-159.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:7:y:2014:i:2:p:144-159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=61475
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:7:y:2014:i:2:p:144-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=91 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.