IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmpra/v3y2008i2p150-163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Precision in managing organisational change: identifying and analysing needs using social constructs

Author

Listed:
  • Mambo G. Mupepi
  • Sylvia C. Mupepi
  • Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi
  • Gayla Jewell

Abstract

The discourse presented in this paper focuses on the deployment of Appreciative Inquiry (AI) to determine organisational needs. The AI methodology enables a co-constructed and systematic analysis that gives a clear and accurate assessment of prevailing cultural conditions, a prerequisite step in introducing and managing change. Using AI will enable deep change to occur. AI is one of the best methods in organisational transformation that has revolutionised how change is introduced and managed. The methodology is a complete change management process equipped with tools for measurement and evaluation of culture in organisations, an interview protocol, and a framework for creating desired change and positivism. The method uses a Four-Dimension Cycle (Four-D Cycle) as its technological hub for determining organisational needs, continued co-constructing of a shared vision, and developing concerted efforts in fulfilling desirable destiny. Using AI as the intervention of choice, this paper draws a discourse that focuses on getting the organisational needs right the first time and the successful implementation of long-lasting desirable change.

Suggested Citation

  • Mambo G. Mupepi & Sylvia C. Mupepi & Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi & Gayla Jewell, 2008. "Precision in managing organisational change: identifying and analysing needs using social constructs," International Journal of Management Practice, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(2), pages 150-163.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:3:y:2008:i:2:p:150-163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=18368
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:3:y:2008:i:2:p:150-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=91 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.