IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmpra/v13y2020i5p547-564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kaizen (continuous improvement) and systems thinking: exploring how kaizen facilitators operationalise values and assumptions

Author

Listed:
  • Noel Criscione-Naylor

Abstract

Continuous improvement and systems thinking philosophies have diversely manifested to include the creation of multidisciplinary teams, referred to as kaizen teams, comprised of high-level leaders through frontline level staff challenged to generate business outcomes through the lens of stakeholder value. The purpose of this study was to identify values, assumptions, and behaviours associated with leaders of these teams during the kaizen process and identify post-participation impact on professional practice. Structured conversations and observations took place with leaders certified to facilitate a kaizen event. Leaders highlighted critical competencies and values that impact the team's ability to innovatively problem solve to achieve objectives as well as consequences for team members and the organisation. Data reveals significant issues organisations must direct their attention to for long-term sustainability and to fully realise their commitment to continuous improvement practices. These issues include constraints of the kaizen structure and non-traditional role responsibilities the kaizen leader takes on to make manufacturing methodologies work in a service-based environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Noel Criscione-Naylor, 2020. "Kaizen (continuous improvement) and systems thinking: exploring how kaizen facilitators operationalise values and assumptions," International Journal of Management Practice, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(5), pages 547-564.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:13:y:2020:i:5:p:547-564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=110004
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:13:y:2020:i:5:p:547-564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=91 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.