IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmpra/v13y2020i4p373-400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategy impact on the choice of partial versus full acquisitions: evidence from Japanese outbound acquisitions

Author

Listed:
  • Kashif Ahmed
  • Ralf Bebenroth

Abstract

In this study, we investigated how strategies adopted by firms impacted their decision to make either partial or full acquisitions in cross-border deals. Our sample comprised Japanese cross-border acquirers that had three different viable strategies, viz. prospectors, defenders, and analysers. Applying transaction cost economics, the strategic capability perspective and the strategic cognition perspective, we found that not only prospectors but also analysers preferred full acquisitions, whereas defenders had a preference for partial acquisitions. This study shows that strategy impacts acquisition behaviour, and cautions managers to consider aspects of partner opportunism and firm capabilities when choosing between partial and full acquisitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kashif Ahmed & Ralf Bebenroth, 2020. "Strategy impact on the choice of partial versus full acquisitions: evidence from Japanese outbound acquisitions," International Journal of Management Practice, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(4), pages 373-400.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:13:y:2020:i:4:p:373-400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=108305
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wafa Tariq Waqar & Yan Ma, 2024. "Acquirers’ corporate governance ratings and the likelihood of deal completion: Do stakeholders care about the agency hazards of European cross-border acquirers?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(10), pages 2815-2848, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:13:y:2020:i:4:p:373-400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=91 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.