IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmore/v5y2013i3p317-344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient operating room redesign through process improvement and optimal management of scheduled and emergent surgeries

Author

Listed:
  • Jomon Aliyas Paul
  • Arun Jotshi

Abstract

This article is focused on the benefits of reducing variability and the role of operations research techniques in efficient operating room (OR) redesign through process improvement and optimal management of scheduled and emergent surgeries at hospitals. Issues at a participant hospital are studied which are presented in this article where in the authors develop a three step OR redesign model to address them. Firstly, the process bottlenecks affecting OR performance were identified with the help of a discrete event simulation (DES) model. Once the DES model focusing on the 'as-is' operations of the OR was built and validated, it was used to evaluate various improvement strategies. Secondly, in order to efficiently deal with unscheduled surgeries, a simulated queuing model was used to determine the number of ORs to be reserved which would help in better managing natural variability. Finally, OR time (with the remaining ORs) was allocated for scheduled surgeries after accommodating various operational constraints including surgeon preferences with the help of a mixed integer programme (MIP) model. The empirical observations and results are presented as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Jomon Aliyas Paul & Arun Jotshi, 2013. "Efficient operating room redesign through process improvement and optimal management of scheduled and emergent surgeries," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(3), pages 317-344.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:5:y:2013:i:3:p:317-344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=53626
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:5:y:2013:i:3:p:317-344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=320 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.