IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmore/v33y2026i2p168-183.html

Performance comparison of random forest and BILSTM for intrusion detection in cyber security environment

Author

Listed:
  • A. Prashanthi
  • R. Ravinder Reddy

Abstract

The widespread adoption of the internet has led to an increase in network attacks, making traditional signature-based detection methods less effective against zero-day attacks. This research examines the efficacy of anomaly-based detection techniques in identifying these threats, using two artificial intelligence models: CNN-BiLSTM and random forest classifier. Data for training and testing these models was sourced from the CICIDS2017 dataset. Results showed a high success rate, with CNN-BiLSTM achieving 95% and random forest classifier achieving 98%. These findings suggest that anomaly-based detection offers a robust strategy for detecting zero-day network attacks. The research also underscores the necessity of assessing detection systems through various performance metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Such metrics provide a comprehensive understanding of an algorithm's effectiveness in diverse scenarios, which is crucial for developing more advanced and secure network security systems capable of addressing emerging threats.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Prashanthi & R. Ravinder Reddy, 2026. "Performance comparison of random forest and BILSTM for intrusion detection in cyber security environment," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 33(2), pages 168-183.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:33:y:2026:i:2:p:168-183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=152320
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:33:y:2026:i:2:p:168-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=320 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.