IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmore/v25y2023i4p433-462.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of regenerative processes approach for the approximation of the ruin probability in a bivariate classical risk model with large claims

Author

Listed:
  • Safia Hocine
  • Djamil Aïssani
  • Aicha Bareche
  • Zina Benouaret

Abstract

In order to reflect more accurately the insurance company's activity, risk models that have been recently studied in the literature are becoming increasingly complex. Moreover, the ruin probability associated with these models cannot be found explicitly. Using the theory of regenerative processes, the present paper focuses on the stability analysis of a two-dimensional classical risk model with large and independent claims. The obtained stability bound is explicitly written and applied to estimate the deviation of the ruin probability under the clarified perturbation domain of the parameters governing the considered model. This proposed approach based on the theory of regenerative processes is more suitable for the stability analysis of ruin probabilities of a risk model since it takes into account large claims, unlike the strong stability method based on Markov chains. A numerical comparison between the stability bounds obtained with both approaches (regenerative process approach and Markov chains approach) is performed, based on simulation results.

Suggested Citation

  • Safia Hocine & Djamil Aïssani & Aicha Bareche & Zina Benouaret, 2023. "Application of regenerative processes approach for the approximation of the ruin probability in a bivariate classical risk model with large claims," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 25(4), pages 433-462.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:25:y:2023:i:4:p:433-462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=132837
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:25:y:2023:i:4:p:433-462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=320 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.