IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmore/v18y2021i4p545-565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Locust swarm optimisation for the permutation flow shop scheduling problem

Author

Listed:
  • Mohanad Al-Behadili
  • Huda Zaki
  • Khaldoun Al-Yasiri

Abstract

The permutation flow shop scheduling problem (PFSP) is one of the most prominent types of combinatorial optimisation problems. The fact comes from its wide applications in manufactures and industries. In this paper, the locust swarm optimisation algorithm (LO) is proposed to find high quality solution for the PFSP, it simulates the behaviour of locust swarm. In this work, the LO algorithm is adapted to solve the PFSP with the objective of minimising the makespan where a heuristic rule called smallest position value (SPV) is triggered to transform the random numbers into sequences of jobs. Then the NEH heuristic of Nawaz-Enscore-Ham is applied to generate good quality initial population. Also, a simple and efficient iterated local search method is employed to explore the solution space efficiently. An experimental study is discussed in this paper to evaluate the performance of the introduced algorithm. Different well-known PFSP benchmarks of small, medium and large size instances are used for this purpose. The computational and statistical studies demonstrate that the proposed algorithm is evidently outperforming the recent algorithms in obtaining better solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohanad Al-Behadili & Huda Zaki & Khaldoun Al-Yasiri, 2021. "Locust swarm optimisation for the permutation flow shop scheduling problem," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(4), pages 545-565.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:545-565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=114207
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:545-565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=320 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.