IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmore/v16y2020i4p480-498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of non-pre-emptive priority retrial queueing system with two-way communication, Bernoulli vacation, collisions, working breakdown, immediate feedback and reneging

Author

Listed:
  • G. Ayyappan
  • J. Udayageetha
  • B. Somasundaram

Abstract

In this study, we investigate a single server priority retrial queueing system including two-way communication, collision, working breakdown, repair, immediate feedback, Bernoulli vacation and reneging. Incoming requests (calls) appear at the service station according to a compound Poisson process. During the idle time, the server can make an outgoing call with an exponentially distributed time. The incoming call that identifies the server occupied will join an orbit or collide with the call currently in service. The server renders the service following a non-pre-emptive priority service rule. The server takes a Bernoulli vacation. The server may become inactive due to normal breakdown and the call currently in service will get the remaining service at a moderate service rate. The repair process starts instantly. After the completion of service, vacation and repair the server is in an idle state. We allow reneging to happen at the orbit. Using the supplementary variable technique, the stability condition is derived.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Ayyappan & J. Udayageetha & B. Somasundaram, 2020. "Analysis of non-pre-emptive priority retrial queueing system with two-way communication, Bernoulli vacation, collisions, working breakdown, immediate feedback and reneging," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(4), pages 480-498.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:16:y:2020:i:4:p:480-498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=108420
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:16:y:2020:i:4:p:480-498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=320 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.