IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmore/v13y2018i1p1-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Material selection for multi-tubular fixed bed reactor Fischer-Tropsch reactor

Author

Listed:
  • Javier Martínez-Gómez
  • Ricardo A. Narváez C.

Abstract

Multi-tubular, fixed bed, Fischer-Tropsch reactor (MFBR) appears as an essential technology for the energy future; moreover it is required to improve and to reduce operation costs. This research used multi-criteria decision making methods (MCDM) for the material selection of a MFBR. It focused on fulfilling the technological requirements for constructing the vessel and piping of a MFBR, while costs reduction is considered as part of the analysis. The MCMD methods are complex proportional assessments of alternatives which apply methods such as grey relations (COPRAS-G), operational competitiveness rating analysis (OCRA), a new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) and technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). The criteria weighting was performed by compromised weighting method composed of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and entropy methods. The ranking results showed that ASME SA-106 and ASME SA-106 29 would be the best materials for the vessel and piping of a MFBR.

Suggested Citation

  • Javier Martínez-Gómez & Ricardo A. Narváez C., 2018. "Material selection for multi-tubular fixed bed reactor Fischer-Tropsch reactor," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:13:y:2018:i:1:p:1-29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=92956
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:13:y:2018:i:1:p:1-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=320 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.