IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmefi/v19y2026i1p60-79.html

Dynamics of credit rationing among microfinance banks beneficiaries in Nigeria: to what extent are farmers' loans rationed along gender lines

Author

Listed:
  • Igwe Ikenna Ukoha
  • Innocent Uche Ojoko Nwaiwu
  • Maryann Nnenna Osuji
  • Okwudili Bismark Ibeagwa
  • Emeka Emmanuel Osuji

Abstract

The gender differentials in credit rationing by microfinance banks (MFBs) among cassava-based farmers in South-East Nigeria were deciphered in this study, while providing an in-depth understanding of the barriers prompting their credit outcomes. Multi-stage sampling was used to select 360 loan applicants, with the aid of a questionnaire using primary data, while descriptive statistics and the Multinomial logistic regression model were employed for the analysis. We observed that more male loan applicants were fully rejected their female counterparts, as indicated by a gap of 7.2%, while the female loan applicants had a higher percentage of their full loan demands met when compared to their male counterparts, as indicated by the widest gap of 20.5% along gender lines. The research suggests policy actions that will enable authorities to develop a framework that adopts gender-specific initiatives that mitigate lending inequities, highlighting the relevance of financial literacy, equitable financial services, and better banking relationships with farmers.

Suggested Citation

  • Igwe Ikenna Ukoha & Innocent Uche Ojoko Nwaiwu & Maryann Nnenna Osuji & Okwudili Bismark Ibeagwa & Emeka Emmanuel Osuji, 2026. "Dynamics of credit rationing among microfinance banks beneficiaries in Nigeria: to what extent are farmers' loans rationed along gender lines," International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(1), pages 60-79.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmefi:v:19:y:2026:i:1:p:60-79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=153827
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmefi:v:19:y:2026:i:1:p:60-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=218 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.