IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmefi/v18y2025i4p282-298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The good, the bad and the ugly: A policy debate on the political budget cycle in India with an ARDL model

Author

Listed:
  • Prashant Ishvarlal Vadikar

Abstract

Fiscal tools can be used to signal voters mainly spending by the incumbents; this study attempts to verify empirically the same in the Indian general election during 1980-1981 to 2020-2021. The study has used the autoregressive distributed lag model to find evidence of the presence of a political budget cycle (PBC). The study assessed the stationarity of the series, selected the lag-length criteria, and even performed the diagnostic test to verify the credibility of the model. There is clear evidence of the presence of the electoral cycle in the pre-election budget, and the outcome seems to be aligned with past empirical studies. The incumbent influences the capital expenditure for the long run and revenue expenditure for the short run before the election year. The Fiscal policy has reduced non-development expenditure in long run; otherwise, the fiscal tools remained insignificant. The study suggests encouraging voters' awareness to enrich their voting decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Prashant Ishvarlal Vadikar, 2025. "The good, the bad and the ugly: A policy debate on the political budget cycle in India with an ARDL model," International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(4), pages 282-298.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmefi:v:18:y:2025:i:4:p:282-298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=148295
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmefi:v:18:y:2025:i:4:p:282-298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=218 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.