IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmefi/v17y2024i1p29-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are machine learning models more effective than logistic regressions in predicting bank credit risk? An assessment of the Brazilian financial markets

Author

Listed:
  • Alex Cerqueira Pinto
  • Alexandre Xavier Ywata de Carvalho
  • Mathias Schneid Tessmann
  • Alexandre Vasconcelos Lima

Abstract

This paper seeks to investigate whether machine learning models are more efficient than logistic regressions to predict credit risk in financial institutions. Through an empirical study that develops the models and applies interpretability techniques to identify the relationships between the variables and their importance, data and economic-financial indicators from Brazilian firms in the wholesale segment are used, combined with the use of supervised machine learning. The results indicate that the model with the best predictor performance is XGBoost, with an accuracy of 0.59 and a ROC curve of 0.97 for out-of-time data. In the interpretability analysis - via sharp value - the results corroborate the importance and economic meaning of the variables. These findings confirm the improvement in the predictive capacity of the models using machine learning techniques and are useful for the financial literature and for financial market agents in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex Cerqueira Pinto & Alexandre Xavier Ywata de Carvalho & Mathias Schneid Tessmann & Alexandre Vasconcelos Lima, 2024. "Are machine learning models more effective than logistic regressions in predicting bank credit risk? An assessment of the Brazilian financial markets," International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(1), pages 29-48.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmefi:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:29-48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=137545
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmefi:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:29-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=218 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.