IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmefi/v12y2019i3p196-211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The signalling cost of hiring a large auditor: evidence from the fee differential between large and small auditors

Author

Listed:
  • Michael K. Fung
  • Louis T.W. Cheng
  • Tak-yan Leung

Abstract

The market for financial auditing is highly concentrated. If large auditors audit with greater accuracy, hiring a large auditor signals the firm's financial report quality to investors. This study considers the competition between large and small auditors and analytically shows that the fee differential between them consists of their audit cost difference and the signalling cost of hiring the former. The negative signal associated with a downward auditor switch is a switching cost. Large auditors therefore cannot compete with small auditors if the former perform no signalling function. The analytical model is empirically estimated to show the magnitude of the signalling cost embedded in a large auditor's audit and non-audit fees. Findings suggest that non-audit fees contain a larger signalling cost component than audit fees do. Moreover, auditees with higher financial report quality are willing to pay a higher signalling cost to signal their financial report quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael K. Fung & Louis T.W. Cheng & Tak-yan Leung, 2019. "The signalling cost of hiring a large auditor: evidence from the fee differential between large and small auditors," International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(3), pages 196-211.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmefi:v:12:y:2019:i:3:p:196-211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=100620
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephanie Monteiro Miller, 2022. "Dual 8-K filings and auditor downward switches," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(2), pages 204-217, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmefi:v:12:y:2019:i:3:p:196-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=218 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.