IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmede/v7y2009i1p1-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correspondences between Kohlberg's theory of moral development and subsequent research in business ethics

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra J. Hartman
  • Lillian Y. Fok
  • Susan M.L. Zee

Abstract

The current focus on business ethics has brought a resurgence of interest in ethics and ethical differences. In this study, we extend the business ethics literature that uses vignettes to present various kinds of ethical dilemmas to examine the relationships among several well-known and widely-used vignette measures, with focus on relationships between the business-oriented model arising from Forsyth's [Forsyth, D.R. (1980) 'A taxonomy of ethical ideologies', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 39, pp.175-184.] work to the more general theory and model of moral development offered by Kohlberg [Kohlberg, L. (1981) Essays in Moral Development. New York, NY: Harper and Row (pp.409-412)]. We identify correspondences, especially between the Forsyth notion of idealism and the Kohlberg discussion of higher levels of moral development, and report correlation between the reasoning behind subjects' behavioural intentions and their moral development.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra J. Hartman & Lillian Y. Fok & Susan M.L. Zee, 2009. "Correspondences between Kohlberg's theory of moral development and subsequent research in business ethics," International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmede:v:7:y:2009:i:1:p:1-10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=25262
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmede:v:7:y:2009:i:1:p:1-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=89 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.