IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmede/v13y2014i2p130-146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption of focus group and policy Delphi to blue ocean strategy: a proposed conceptual model

Author

Listed:
  • Alex Hou Hong Ng
  • Dominic Hoe Chai Lau
  • Wan Khairuzzaman Wan Ismail

Abstract

Although blue ocean strategy (BOS) has been well regarded and widely accepted in both academic and business domains recently, nevertheless some researchers criticised the concept is being too descriptive and lack of formulated theoretical foundation. In this context, this paper aims to further extend the BOS formulation process by introducing quantitative approach to substantiate the validity of key competing factors in the strategy canvas to strengthen its theoretical construct. The paper begins by highlighting the background and research questions of this study, followed by a brief review on the concept of BOS and its analytical tools as well as the related research problems and issues. Subsequently, focus group and policy Delphi were introduced to incorporate into the BOS formulation process and a conceptual model is proposed to address the questions raised earlier. Finally, it is concluded with a proposed conceptual model and the future research avenue.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex Hou Hong Ng & Dominic Hoe Chai Lau & Wan Khairuzzaman Wan Ismail, 2014. "Adoption of focus group and policy Delphi to blue ocean strategy: a proposed conceptual model," International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(2), pages 130-146.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmede:v:13:y:2014:i:2:p:130-146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=62547
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmede:v:13:y:2014:i:2:p:130-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=89 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.