IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmdma/v25y2026i2p184-213.html

A bounded rationality integrated decision-making approach for supplier selection in lean practice: a case study of Vietnam's garment industry

Author

Listed:
  • Thi-Ly Nguyen
  • Chia-Nan Wang
  • Nhat-Luong Nhieu

Abstract

Lean manufacturing focuses on eliminating waste across production. In supplier selection, applying lean principles helps identify partners that minimise waste in the supply chain. This study proposes an integrated multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach for supplier selection in Vietnam's garment industry. It combines stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) with a regret theory-based evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) under spherical fuzzy conditions. The SF SWARA method determines evaluation criteria weights, while the regret-based SF EDAS ranks suppliers by proximity to the ideal solution. Findings show the hybrid approach enhances accuracy and reliability in lean supplier selection, supporting cost reduction and quality improvement. The study also offers a roadmap for practitioners and policymakers to optimise supplier evaluation, strengthen supply chain performance, and advance sustainable lean practices. Overall, it enriches decision-making methodologies within lean supply chain management and extends relevance to other industries facing similar challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Thi-Ly Nguyen & Chia-Nan Wang & Nhat-Luong Nhieu, 2026. "A bounded rationality integrated decision-making approach for supplier selection in lean practice: a case study of Vietnam's garment industry," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 25(2), pages 184-213.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:25:y:2026:i:2:p:184-213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=152083
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:25:y:2026:i:2:p:184-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=19 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.