IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmdma/v24y2025i6p557-582.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulatory focus theory and psychological decision making: a systematic literature review and future outlook

Author

Listed:
  • Sradhanjali Samal
  • Saurabh Gupta

Abstract

Psychological theories have been extensively applied in consumer psychological literature to understand the elements that influence user intentions and decision-making processes. Regulatory focus theory (RFT) explores the ways in which decision-making is shaped by an emphasis on promotion and prevention. This study aims to perform a systematic literature review (SLR) of the existing literature to consolidate the current understanding of RFT. Therefore, this investigation aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the foundations of RFT and its connections with other relevant concepts in the realm of psychological theories. Furthermore, it provides an in-depth review of the most recent findings, significant topics, practical implications, and possible future directions in the realm of RFT literature. The findings highlight the important influence of the promotion focus and prevention focus framework in forecasting psychological decision-making processes. The analysis provides valuable insights for scholars and practitioners seeking to expand their comprehension of RFT. It addresses RFT's advantages and disadvantages, focuses on how it is used in different situations, and emphasises the need for methodological improvements in decision making research.

Suggested Citation

  • Sradhanjali Samal & Saurabh Gupta, 2025. "Regulatory focus theory and psychological decision making: a systematic literature review and future outlook," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 24(6), pages 557-582.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:24:y:2025:i:6:p:557-582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=149592
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:24:y:2025:i:6:p:557-582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=19 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.