IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmdma/v13y2014i4p335-355.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Group decision-making processes and group decision quality: moderation of mutual interest

Author

Listed:
  • Aziz Bakay
  • Jun Huang
  • Yundong Huang

Abstract

Considering the existence of mutual interest in work groups within organisational context, we investigated three main decision-making processes: personal task participation, negative socio-emotional behaviour and information domination. To illustrate the relationship between group decision-making processes and decision quality, we developed and tested a process model in which the final group decision quality could be predicted by abovementioned decision-making processes. Testing the moderation effect of mutual interest is considered as focus of study and its implications are discussed. Further expansion of our model involves process satisfaction as an intervening variable. The overall assessment of the group decision-making process was captured in the process satisfaction construct and its association with decision quality was analysed. The findings suggested that our 1st model supported the moderation of mutual interest with one exception. The findings of the 2nd model suggested that satisfaction of the group members about decision processes is strongly associated with decision quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Aziz Bakay & Jun Huang & Yundong Huang, 2014. "Group decision-making processes and group decision quality: moderation of mutual interest," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(4), pages 335-355.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:13:y:2014:i:4:p:335-355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=65347
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:13:y:2014:i:4:p:335-355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=19 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.