IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmdma/v13y2014i2p174-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To overstate or not: how to describe new products online for e-tailers considering full return policy

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Xiong
  • Jin Qin

Abstract

In order to compete with online and offline rivals, e-tailers need to pay specific attention to online product description to attract customers and get their orders. Most e-tailers also provide full return service to lower customers' risk perception of online purchase and minimise their possible loss. How to describe product online in consideration of full return policy is a difficult problem for e-tailers since overstatement may increase sales but incur more returns, otherwise the sales may decrease as well as the return cost. In this paper, we study e-tailer's optimal description strategy for new products which have low salvage values. Our results indicate that monopoly e-tailer will not overstate in new product description considering the full return policy. In duopoly case, low quality e-tailer will not overstate while high quality e-tailer will do under certain conditions, and high quality e-tailer's overstatement will benefit both e-tailers under full return policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Xiong & Jin Qin, 2014. "To overstate or not: how to describe new products online for e-tailers considering full return policy," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(2), pages 174-191.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:13:y:2014:i:2:p:174-191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=60863
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:13:y:2014:i:2:p:174-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=19 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.