IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmdma/v11y2011i3-4p231-248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Radioactive manufacturing projects and politics: scientist and politician normalised risk decision process

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth David Strang

Abstract

Radiology product manufacturing draws a high level of public scrutiny as well as peer pressure on subject matter experts in the community of practice. There are numerous qualitative and quantitative variables. Experts often widely disagree on proprieties or neglect to discriminate between seemingly identical alternatives. The risks are high and many projects fail; thus, an improved approach is proposed and tested. In this study, a mixed-methods action research approach was used, involving brainstorming and quantitative analysis techniques. The analytical hierarchy process and a new multiple criteria normalisation techniques were used to build a decision-making model.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth David Strang, 2011. "Radioactive manufacturing projects and politics: scientist and politician normalised risk decision process," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(3/4), pages 231-248.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:11:y:2011:i:3/4:p:231-248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=40701
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:11:y:2011:i:3/4:p:231-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=19 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.