IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmdma/v10y2009i5-6p341-358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology acceptance in public sector: an empirical study of a Knowledge Management System in Kaohsiung City Government

Author

Listed:
  • Pin-Yu Chu
  • Tai-Zu Wu
  • Chien-Hao Lee

Abstract

This research investigates the applicability of the extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to user acceptance of a Knowledge Management System (KMS) in the public sector. Significant positive relationships between perceived usefulness, ease of use, behavioural intention, and behaviour were consistent with previous research results. The observed mediating role of perceived usefulness in the relationship between ease of use and behavioural usage was also in consonance with earlier findings of similar research in the private sector. Cognitive instrumental processes, including job relevance, output quality, result demonstrability, and perceived ease of use significantly affect perceived usefulness. Policy implications and recommendations for promoting KMSs in the public sector are further discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Pin-Yu Chu & Tai-Zu Wu & Chien-Hao Lee, 2009. "Technology acceptance in public sector: an empirical study of a Knowledge Management System in Kaohsiung City Government," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(5/6), pages 341-358.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:10:y:2009:i:5/6:p:341-358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=26682
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:10:y:2009:i:5/6:p:341-358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=19 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.