IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcst/v1y2016i1p44-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An examination of cross-cultural differences in e-service quality, e-satisfaction and e-marketing success: Korean vs. American portal sites

Author

Listed:
  • Qingji Fan
  • Hye-Ran Kim
  • Jeoung Yul Lee

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine e-service quality, e-satisfaction and e-WOM performance as measures of e-marketing success and identify whether or not cultural differences influence e-marketing success between South Korea and the USA. Especially, our focus is on customers of portal sites, i.e., Naver and Google (the largest portals in the two countries). A cross-culture survey was conducted and 250 Koreans and 300 Americans responses were collected by two commercial research institutes in Korea and the USA, respectively. The four dimensions of e-service quality and e-WOM performance were suggested as antecedents and output, respectively, as e-marketing success by a few analyses. Noticeably, we found that there are differences in influences of credibility and responsiveness on e-satisfaction between the Korean and American portal site customers but there are no significant differences in influences of the other variables such as contents attractiveness and entertainment. This suggests that the differences lead to better understanding of cultural influences on e-marketing and provide practical implications to internet companies offering services internationally.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingji Fan & Hye-Ran Kim & Jeoung Yul Lee, 2016. "An examination of cross-cultural differences in e-service quality, e-satisfaction and e-marketing success: Korean vs. American portal sites," International Journal of Multinational Corporation Strategy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 44-64.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcst:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:44-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=76657
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcst:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:44-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=450 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.