IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcph/v4y2010i3-4p244-266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

After shame; before corporate moral obligation (CMO): ethical lag and the credit crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Gwendolyn Yvonne Alexis
  • Steven Pressman

Abstract

The global financial crisis brought down some of the world's largest and most well-established financial institutions. In an area of business activity where tradition and trust are said to count for much, astonishing levels of open criminality, venality, and willingness to exploit weak regulatory structures were brought to light by the financial crisis. This paper is a paraenetic comment on that crisis. It is an exhortation to better business practices, a recognition that the crisis was brought about because the old sanctions of shame and regulation failed to deter unethical behaviour. The paper reviews some of the reasons for this and introduces the idea of corporate moral obligation (CMO) as an alternative ethic. We suggest that CMO better captures a universal commitment to unwavering values than does the more utilitarian approach of weighing the interests of various stakeholders, many of whom lack the power to secure what is their rightful due. In commending CMO, we do not aim to anticipate every objection but rather to encourage consideration of one possible way of overcoming the ethical lag exposed by the global credit crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Gwendolyn Yvonne Alexis & Steven Pressman, 2010. "After shame; before corporate moral obligation (CMO): ethical lag and the credit crisis," International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(3/4), pages 244-266.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:4:y:2010:i:3/4:p:244-266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=37811
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:4:y:2010:i:3/4:p:244-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=90 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.