IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcph/v4y2010i1p71-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Homogeneity or heterogeneity? On the nature of management ideas and their spread

Author

Listed:
  • Anders Ortenblad

Abstract

This paper offers an alternative approach to the spread of management ideas. It is an approach that can explain, better than the fashion perspective, the differences between organisations adopting the same management idea and that can explain, better than the translation perspective, the similarities between the practices of organisations. Management ideas have a socially constructed nature and ideas existing in the same area consist of the same set of themes, albeit differently emphasised. Management ideas are both ambiguous and unambiguous, organisations are becoming both more similar and more dissimilar as a consequence of the spread of management ideas and the ideas are both new and old. Following fashion is thus quite an easy task; organisations do not have to make very big changes in order to become or remain legitimate. This argument is illustrated by the following management ideas: knowledge management, the learning company, the learning organisation and organisational learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Anders Ortenblad, 2010. "Homogeneity or heterogeneity? On the nature of management ideas and their spread," International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1), pages 71-86.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:4:y:2010:i:1:p:71-86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=31303
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:4:y:2010:i:1:p:71-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=90 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.