IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcph/v3y2008i1p66-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The dark side of narratives: challenging the epistemological nature of narrative knowledge

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Geiger

Abstract

This article presents an attempt to reproblematise certain aspects of narratives in organisations which are too often taken for granted. The epistemological nature of narrative knowledge is explored by referring to a distinction between discursive and narrative knowledge drawn by the French philosopher Lyotard. Narrative knowledge is characterised as a kind of verbal life-world knowledge that is non-reflexive in character by contrast to discursive knowledge which is based on reasons and therefore argumentative and reflexive in nature. Recent literature on narrative knowledge sharing has concentrated almost exclusively on the bright side of narrative knowledge as valuable category, in this article it is argued that there is a dark side as well that deserves attention. The narrative/discursive distinction allows a discussion of the dark sides of narratives and narrative knowledge and might serve as a fruitful epistemological framework for our understanding of narrative knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Geiger, 2008. "The dark side of narratives: challenging the epistemological nature of narrative knowledge," International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 66-81.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:3:y:2008:i:1:p:66-81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=18531
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:3:y:2008:i:1:p:66-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=90 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.