IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcph/v2y2007i3p246-254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a theory of project failure

Author

Listed:
  • Marcus Lindahl
  • Alf Rehn

Abstract

Projects fail. This fact, which is commonsensical and objectively true, has been viewed within the sphere of project studies as either a pathological state to be avoided or a logical problem of goal definition. We will, in this paper, propose a different take on this, one that utilises social theory and political philosophy in order to position project failure in a more general context, and to analyse it as potentially beneficial. By introducing some theoretical perspectives – such as Georges Bataille's 'general economy', Thorstein Veblen on conspicuous action and the political theories of Carl Schmitt – we thus wish to develop the ways in which project failures can be conceptualised, in ways that do not simply condemn such. Rather, we show how failure can be analysed and discussed as productive, without slipping into the vulgar relativism of 'it all depends on perspective'.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcus Lindahl & Alf Rehn, 2007. "Towards a theory of project failure," International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3), pages 246-254.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:2:y:2007:i:3:p:246-254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=15000
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:2:y:2007:i:3:p:246-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=90 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.