IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcph/v2y2006i1p82-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing 'collisions' between entrepreneurial networks and industrial supply chains: a modified Penrosian perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Blundel

Abstract

The paper explores contrasting ways in which the 'focal firm' network most commonly associated with smaller, entrepreneurial ventures engages with the characteristically vertical network morphology associated with established industrial supply chains. The central argument, which builds on the extensive literature relating to inter-organisational networks, is that empirical research in this area lacks appropriate conceptual tools to address the complex and dynamic interactions that arise from 'collisions' between these contrasting network types. A simple explanatory framework is introduced, which is based around an extension of the Penrosian concept of 'productive opportunity' (Penrose, 1959; 1995; Best, 2001). The framework indicates four generic interaction patterns ('classical', 'centrifugal', 'centripetal' and 'collateral'), derived when the different forms of productive opportunity are coupled with the relative stability of the relevant inter-organisational relationships. The principal features of each pattern are outlined, and their dynamics are depicted in four brief, case-based cameos. The concluding section indicates possible refinements and assesses the implications for future research and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Blundel, 2006. "Managing 'collisions' between entrepreneurial networks and industrial supply chains: a modified Penrosian perspective," International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 82-97.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:2:y:2006:i:1:p:82-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=9648
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:2:y:2006:i:1:p:82-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=90 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.