IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcph/v1y2004i1p27-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Autopoiesis and dysfunctional organisational processes

Author

Listed:
  • Deborah Blackman
  • Steven Henderson

Abstract

There is now a growing literature and management prescription that purports to be based on the biological theory of autopoiesis. Doubts have arisen concerning the effects of changing the theory from its biological base to the social basis advanced by Luhman. In this paper, we apply the original theory as derived by Maturana and Varela as a metaphor to the learning organisation as defined by Senge. This approach is chosen because it can be shown that Senge's prescriptions could exacerbate tendencies towards autopoietic dynamics. By working through the analysis, we are able to show that autopoietic tendencies within a firm would be highly dangerous, and would most likely defeat attempts to manage them, or manage with them. It also suggests that the learning organisation is ultimately self-defeating if autopoiesis is an effective organisational metaphor.

Suggested Citation

  • Deborah Blackman & Steven Henderson, 2004. "Autopoiesis and dysfunctional organisational processes," International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 27-42.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:1:y:2004:i:1:p:27-42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=4841
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:1:y:2004:i:1:p:27-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=90 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.