IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcph/v19y2026i5p1-20.html

The much-discussed gap between employers' demands and business school graduates' competence: an intriguing finding

Author

Listed:
  • Anders Örtenblad
  • Riina Koris
  • Katri Kerem

Abstract

Previous employability studies point at a gap between employers' expectations of business school graduates and what business schools produce. The majority of such studies identify individual employability skills that are the most important for employers and compare these with what business schools teach. This study takes a more holistic approach and identifies the types of business school graduates whom employers are looking for. Based on interviews with employers in Estonia, our findings give rise to three rationales as to why there is little (if any) reason for business schools to reconsider what they teach. First, there seems to be an overlap between what employers ask for and what business schools produce. Second, employees tend to regard the bachelor degree per se as a proxy for employability. Third, employers suggest that new hires can learn what they need to conduct their work tasks on-the-job.

Suggested Citation

  • Anders Örtenblad & Riina Koris & Katri Kerem, 2026. "The much-discussed gap between employers' demands and business school graduates' competence: an intriguing finding," International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(5), pages 1-20.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:19:y:2026:i:5:p:1-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=151273
    Download Restriction: Open Access
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:19:y:2026:i:5:p:1-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=90 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.