IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcph/v13y2020i3p236-246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding of crisis management: a theoretical literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Wa'ed Alshoubaki

Abstract

Crisis management is a relatively new field. It was founded in the mid-1980s following several natural and man-made crises stemming from modernisation, according to the pioneers of the field. This paper's aim is to discuss the theoretical models and concepts required to manage a crisis. Moreover, it addresses public administration challenges with dealing with a crisis. The research strategy is built upon Cooper's taxonomy of a literature review to determine the appropriate methodology for achieving an inclusive and critical review for crisis management. A theoretical literature review is conducted to focus on theoretical concepts so as to foster an understanding of the management mechanisms of crisis and the main policy landmarks to mitigate the repercussions of the crisis. This paper addresses the concept of risk society, the typologies of crisis, the interaction risk dimensions, and the role of public administration in responding to the crisis. It considers international crisis management due to the spillover effect of the crisis. It also offers some discussion about the challenges of managing the crisis, including the impossibility of circumscribing the effect of the crisis, the effect of politics in responding to the crisis, and the small events that may cause greater consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Wa'ed Alshoubaki, 2020. "Understanding of crisis management: a theoretical literature review," International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(3), pages 236-246.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:13:y:2020:i:3:p:236-246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=111025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:13:y:2020:i:3:p:236-246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=90 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.