IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcph/v13y2020i1p39-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of the return forecasting power of domestic and international equity investors: evidence from India

Author

Listed:
  • V. Gopikumar
  • Smitha Nair
  • V.K. Anand Krishnan

Abstract

Emerging markets have benefited from positive cross-border flows primarily due to a favourable growth differential relative to similar markets. However, the benefits from international flows have been sub-optimal due to the relatively weak information environment. In this paper, we compare the return forecasting power of international and domestic institutional investors using a comprehensive equity holdings dataset of Indian firms for the period 2001-2017. Each year-quarter, we run separate cross-sectional regressions of one-quarter ahead stock returns on the level holdings of domestic and foreign investors and several control variables. The results show that international institutional investors are at a disadvantage relative to domestic institutions in predicting future returns. Further, the predictive power of domestic institutional investor demand is superior for firms in the smallest size quartile relative to the largest size quartile.

Suggested Citation

  • V. Gopikumar & Smitha Nair & V.K. Anand Krishnan, 2020. "A comparison of the return forecasting power of domestic and international equity investors: evidence from India," International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 39-50.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:39-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=108810
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:39-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=90 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.