IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcph/v12y2019i4p409-421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human resource management practices effectiveness analysis considering deviant behaviours in workplace: case study

Author

Listed:
  • Hadi Teimouri
  • Kouroush Jenab
  • Maryam Dezhtaherian
  • Razieh Aghaei

Abstract

The behaviour of the employees in the organisation have to produce, but sometimes this behaviour not only in the production but also disrupt the production process has prevented the organisation to achieve its goals. However, some factors such as human resources, effective measures can prevent malicious behaviour. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between HRM practices and deviant behaviours in the workplace effectiveness of agro-livestock in Isfahan. The study population consisted of experts and managers Cultivation and Livestock Company of FOKA and the simple random sampling method was used for the sample of 122 people has been estimated as equivalent. The instrument used for data collection in this study is self-made questionnaire. The results of this study show that the effectiveness of human resource management practices in various areas of recruitment, training, performance evaluation and compensation is a significant negative relationship with deviant behaviours. Deviant behaviour in recent years has attracted the attention of researchers, the effectiveness of human resource practices, can be of value and originality of the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Hadi Teimouri & Kouroush Jenab & Maryam Dezhtaherian & Razieh Aghaei, 2019. "Human resource management practices effectiveness analysis considering deviant behaviours in workplace: case study," International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(4), pages 409-421.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:12:y:2019:i:4:p:409-421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=103160
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:12:y:2019:i:4:p:409-421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=90 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.