IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcdm/v7y2018i3-4p195-216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining the PROMETHEE method and mathematical programming for multi-objective facility location problem

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Ali Elleuch
  • Ahmed Frikha

Abstract

The decision making concerning where to locate new facilities is crucial in designing distribution networks. In the present study, the supply chain concept and the multi-objective facility location problem were studied. We integrated also multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and linear programming model (LPM) methods to support selection of best sites according many objectives. In addition, facility location decision involves both qualitative and quantitative criteria. In order to select the best location, it is often necessary to compromise possibly conflicting tangible and intangible factors. The major weaknesses of the different multi-objective programming models used to solve the problem are that they are basically mathematical and they ignore qualitative objectives, such as the environmental and socio-economic factors which are important in facility location selection. In this paper, we reported the obtained results when applying an integrated MCDA/LPM approach to solve the facility location problem (FLP) for an aluminium company in Tunisia. We combined three methods, preference-ranking organisation method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) and a linear programming model (LPM), using the stretching and shrinking graphs method (SSG method).

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Ali Elleuch & Ahmed Frikha, 2018. "Combining the PROMETHEE method and mathematical programming for multi-objective facility location problem," International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(3/4), pages 195-216.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcdm:v:7:y:2018:i:3/4:p:195-216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=94377
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcdm:v:7:y:2018:i:3/4:p:195-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=350 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.